Having trouble to enhance your production output and maintain the unit costs at a low level? The output of their injection molding machines limits the growth of many business owners. A single cavity mold can be dependable and may be a bottleneck slacking off lead times and losing you potentially valuable contracts. What would happen, should you be able to make twice or even four times as much with the same machines you have bought? It can, and the solution is in high-technology equipment.
Multi-cavity designs and stack molds are the best methods to increase the injection molding efficiency. Multi-cavity molds make a number of the same components in a single cycle, reducing the unit price and manufacturing time by a significant factor. Stack molds raise this by adding several layers of cavities, or stacks, on a single base of a mold. This may increase to twice or even four times your productivity at that same size molding machine, optimal use of equipment, less labor expense, and the overall production throughput is enormous.

You can see the potential in these advanced molds. But this isn’t just about cramming as many cavities as possible into a block of steel. Choosing the wrong strategy can be a costly mistake, leading to inefficient production or an investment in a tool that doesn’t fit your needs. To make the right call for your business, you need to understand the fundamentals and the specific applications for each technology.
Let’s break it all down, starting with the foundation of high-volume production: the multi-cavity mold.
What exactly is a multi-cavity mold and when should you use one?
You must manufacture a very large quantity of one component, but you cost per part is simply too high to compete. When you only have one cavity mold, your machine cycle only produces one part and extends your lead times and reduces your profit margins. Multi-cavity molds are a direct solution to this one, as they are able to produce large quantities of parts simultaneously, reducing the cost and delivery time by a massive margin, and making your own business much more competitive.
Multi-cavity mold is an injection mold that is designed with two or more identical cavities, which is why they can produce multiple parts in one molding run. A multi-cavity mold is a choice that you should make in case you require a high-volume production up to approximately 100,000 units per year and a finalized and stable part design. It is the ideal fit when it comes to lowering the cost-per-part of smaller parts when the increased capital investment in the tooling is easily paid off by the huge savings in production in the long run.

The Basics of Multiplying Output
The concept is simple but powerful. Instead of one cavity, the mold has 2, 4, 8, 16, or even more identical cavities. When the mold closes and plastic is injected, it fills all these cavities simultaneously. So, in a single cycle that might take 20 seconds, you get 16 parts instead of just one. Your machine time, labor cost, and energy usage are now spread across 16 parts, which causes the price of each individual part to plummet. I remember working with a business owner, let’s call him Michael, who had a huge contract for a small consumer electronics bezel. His initial quotes were based on a 4-cavity mold. But when we ran the numbers for his yearly volume of 2 million units, the savings from moving to a 32-cavity mold were staggering. The initial tool was more expensive, but he broke even in just a few months and significantly increased his profit margin for the rest of the multi-year contract.
When Is It the Right Call?
The choice made to use a multi-cavity tool will be reliant on certain factors. Production volume is the most crucial one. When you have a simple requirement of 10,000 parts then the expensive nature of a complicated multi-cavity tool is difficult to substantiate. But for 500,000 parts? It’s a no-brainer. Stability of part design is also of importance. The cost of a design change is costly and time consuming after you make a 16-cavity mold because you will need to adjust all the 16 cavities equally. When your design is frozen, then you should commit. And lastly, there is the part. Good candidates are smaller and simpler parts. In larger components, the mold may be very large and heavy that it needs a very large and expensive molding machine, which can at times counterbalance the savings.
Balancing Cavity Count and Costs
There’s a sweet spot for the number of cavities. While more cavities mean a lower part price, the mold itself becomes exponentially more complex and expensive. The runner system that feeds plastic to each cavity must be perfectly balanced to ensure every part is identical. Maintenance also becomes more intensive. It’s a balancing act.
Here’s a simplified look at the trade-offs:
| Feature | 2-Cavity Mold | 8-Cavity Mold | 32-Cavity Mold |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tooling Cost | Moderate | High | Very High |
| Part Price | Low | Very Low | Extremely Low |
| Cycle Time | Unchanged | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Parts per Hour | Double | 8x | 32x |
| Maintenance | Simple | Moderate | Complex |
| Risk of Defects | Low | Moderate | Higher (if not built well) |
For Michael, the 32-cavity tool was the right call because his volume justified the cost and complexity. For another client with a mid-range volume of 150,000 parts, an 8-cavity tool was the perfect balance of cost and efficiency. The key is to analyze your specific project needs.
Types of multi-cavity molds
Major types of multi cavity molds are:
Regular Multi-Cavity Molds:
In these molds, several identical cavities are put into a single mold with several identical parts being produced in a single injection cycle. The type is the best in regard to speed and efficiency in production and is best suited to high volume production of uniform parts in order to get the same quality and shorten the cycle time and cost per part.
Family Molds (or Combination Molds):
Family molds are a type of multi-cavity mold, in contrast to regular multi-cavity molds, but the cavities in the family mold are filled with other parts of the same pattern, usually of the same material and colour. Indicatively, a family mold could create a left and right side of a product at the same time. The family molds are more flexible in production but are prone to defects and are also a bit complex.
Side-Action Multi-Cavity Molds:
A specialized multipart multi-cavity molds constructed with side actions (movable mold elements) to create complicated shapes on a particular cavity like holes or undercuts. They are more expensive to produce and may have more problems, though permit more detailed designs of parts, with multiple hollows.
Selection of the types varies with the amount of production, complexity of part, and the design needs. Mass production of the same part with identical parts will use regular multi-cavity molds, complementary parts in a single mold cycle will use family molds, and multifaceted parts with special features in many cavities will use side-action molds.
The design also puts into consideration layout of the cavity, runner, cooling channels, and the possibility of defects depending on increase of size and complexity of the moulds. These are optimized to ensure the consistency of the quality of parts in all cavities of multi-cavity molds.
How does a stack mold take production to the next level?
You are already using multi-cavity molds and have a 16 or 32-cavity tool and the demand of customers is still exceeding what you are able to produce. Your machines are running 24/7. Doubling up to new and bigger molding machines is the natural next of course, however, that is a huge capital burden that you are not yet prepared to take and the additional space in the factory floor, which you have no surplus. You feel like you’ve hit a wall. The technological fix that allows you to break through that wall is a stack mold, which allows doubling your production without any modifications to machines.
A stack mold is made by stacking two or more surfaces of the parting together. Consider it as inserting two molds in the position of one. An example is a stack mold with 16 cavities per level (a 2×16 thermoplastic) that are run on a 2-level stack which has a y=32 parts per cycle. This is ground breaking as it will increase the production of a normal 16 cavity mold with less enlargement of the press. It actually doubles what you have in terms of equipment, labor and factory floor space.

The ‘Mold Within a Mold’ Concept
Imagine a standard mold. It is divided into two halves, one cavity side and one core side, which come together at one line, the parting line. A stack mold inserts a third center plate. This forms two lines of parting. You have got holes now on each side of that plate in the centre. As the mold is opened, it opens at two points and throws away components of both sides of the mold. Three levels mold increases plates further to form four layers of cavities (4x output). It is so brilliant to increase the production with the same physical space. This was practiced when I observed a client who was manufacturing disposable food containers. They were running a 500 ton press with 8 cavity mold at full capacity. They did not purchase a 1000 ton press, but we developed a 2×8 (16 cavity) stack mold that would fit their existing 500 ton machine. They doubled their production immediately and did not have to make a six-figure investment in new equipment.
Key Components and the Clamping Force Advantage
What makes this possible is a specialized hot runner system and a mechanical system for opening the mold. A hot runner manifold in the center plate channels molten plastic to both layers of cavities simultaneously. Then, a gear and rack system or other mechanisms ensure that when the press opens, both parting lines separate evenly. But here is the most important advantage for a business owner: a stack mold does not double the required clamping force. Clamping force is determined by the pressure of the plastic pushing the mold open, which is calculated based on the "projected area" of all the parts and runners. In a stack mold, the two layers of cavities are back-to-back. The pressure from one layer pushes in one direction, and the pressure from the other layer pushes in the opposite direction, effectively canceling each other out. This means a press that can handle a 16-cavity standard mold can often handle a 2×16 (32-cavity) stack mold, giving you double the parts for the same machine cost.
Real-World Impact on Your Bottom Line
The impact is transformative. You can now bid more aggressively on high-volume contracts because your production capacity is doubled. You delay major capital expenditures on new machines and building expansions. You get more output per square foot of factory space, per operator, and per kilowatt of energy. This isn’t just an incremental improvement; it’s a step-change in manufacturing efficiency. It turns your existing assets into super-producers, giving you a powerful competitive edge in the market.
Why do we use Stack Molding?
Stack molding has become the game-changer in the production of plastics due to the many benefits that it has to offer.
High Yield:
Take the scenario when you are able to increase the production of your plastic products by two or even three times without the need to increase your factory. That is a fact with a stack molding. They construct these molds as long-lasting to guarantee high profits in the years.
Mass Production of Quality Products:
Stacking of high-quality products is very beautiful because it has a number of cavities. This is the ability to manufacture different plastic products to suit demand. There are no such wonders that it has become popular among manufacturers.
Best in Perfect Mating Parts:
Stack molding will be your solution to use when it comes to threaded plastic part joining. It is also capable of supporting different designs without any issue, and this is why it is a favourite with the product engineers who are looking to do more with a smaller number of runs.
Reduced Costs of Production:
More spending, less. Stack molding stimulates production as well as reduces the expenses. Besides, the process is not compromised in quality when done well.
Minimum Cooling Time:
But that is not everything. Another ace in the stack moulding is the fact that there is no need to prolong the cooling time. With injection stack molds, all the plastic products in the various cavities dry up at the same time. This will not only save energy but will also save on your bills.
How do you choose between a stack mold and a standard multi-cavity mold?
You have a high-volume work, and you are sure that a tool with one cavity cannot cut it. It now comes down to high-cavitation standard mold (e.g., 32 cavities) or a stack mold (e.g., 2×16 cavities). Making the wrong choice might cost you tens of thousands of a new, larger press when you might have gotten away with a simpler tool, or the complex stack mold when you would have gotten by with a less complex tool. The economic implications are high and the decision seems to be numbing. Knowing some of the key variables will call the decision to the point and safeguard your bottom line.
Select a typical multi-cavity mold with large volumes in case your current machines possess sufficient clamping force to be used in the number of cavities required. Use a stack mold when you need more output than the size of your current press can yield in a regular mold, or when you are simply unwilling to acquire a larger press. A stack mold is a tactic that is used to ensure the optimization of the performance of a given machine size and therefore is mostly used with parts that have a big surface area but a small depth as is the case with lids or plates.

Start by Analyzing Your Machine Park
The first question I always ask my clients is, "What molding machines do you have?" The decision often comes down to your available press tonnage. Let’s say you need to produce 32 parts per cycle to meet demand. A standard 32-cavity mold might require a 600-ton press. But if your largest machine is only 400 tons, you have two options: buy a new 600-ton press, or build a 2×16 (32-cavity) stack mold that can run on your existing 400-ton press. The stack mold will have a higher upfront cost than a standard 16-cavity mold, but it will be significantly cheaper than buying a brand new machine. It allows you to sweat your existing assets for maximum value. If you already have the 600-ton press available, a standard 32-cavity mold might be the more straightforward and slightly cheaper tooling option.
Part Geometry and Material Matter
Stack molds are particularly well-suited for parts that are relatively flat or shallow, like lids, petri dishes, or shallow containers. These parts have a large projected area relative to their volume. For these parts, a stack mold offers a huge advantage in clamping force efficiency. For very deep, complex parts, like a long tube or a part with deep cores, a stack mold can be more challenging to design and may not be the best fit. Furthermore, the type of plastic is a consideration. Some high-temperature or shear-sensitive materials can be difficult to process through the more complex hot runner system of a stack mold, making a standard multi-cavity tool a safer bet.
Calculating the Tipping Point
This decision is all about the numbers. We need to compare the total investment and the return. I often build a simple comparison table for my clients to make the choice clear.
| Factor | Option A: Standard 32-Cavity Mold | Option B: Stack Mold (2×16) |
|---|---|---|
| Output | 32 parts/cycle | 32 parts/cycle |
| Required Machine | 600-ton press | 400-ton press |
| New Machine Cost | Requires new $250k press | Uses existing press ($0) |
| Tooling Cost | $120,000 | $180,000 |
| Total Initial Cost | $370,000 | $180,000 |
In this scenario, even though the stack mold tooling is $60,000 more expensive, it saves the company from a $250,000 machine purchase, making it the clear winner with a $190,000 saving. Every project is different, but by laying out the costs this way, the best path forward becomes obvious.
Hot-Runner Stack Molding Technology: How Is It Different?
Hot-runner stack molding technology differs only slightly with the normal injection molding technology in that it is the combination of the advantages of the hot-runner system with the stack molds where two times the part output is achieved without doubling the size of the mold or machine.
Rather than adding the number of cavities by increasing the size of the molds, stack molds add a second layer of cavities with comparable fill, pack, and cooling cycle times with only minor increases in mold open and closed times.
Hot-runner systems preserve the plastic melt at an injected temperature, minimizing material wastage and raising the quality of parts, and stack molds minimize clamp tonnage needs and machine dimensions, maximizing cost efficiency and capacity. It works particularly well with flat, thin-walled components, packages, caps and lids as well as large surface panels and it maximizes production as twice the number of parts may be produced with minimal or equal equipment area as compared to conventional single-face molds.
Key Differences of Hot-Runner Stack Molding Technology
Two-layer Cavity Arrangement: Stack molds do not have a single layer cavity, but two parallel layers, which actually doubles the amount of output using the same base area of the mold.
Hot-Runner Integration: Hot-runner systems have melt channels that are heated and insulated allowing continuous flow of plastic, minimizing runners scrap, and minimizing the run-time.
Reduced Variations in Cycle Times: Fill, pack and cooling times are close to those of single-face molds; only, open/close times in the molds are a little longer.
Material and Cost Saving: Hot runners reduce plastic waste by removing cooled runners and enhance the quality of the product by having uniform melt flow.
The technology makes the production process smoother, more efficient and less costly than the traditional injection molding machines.
What are the hidden costs and challenges of these advanced molds?
The ability to make two times the output and reduce part cost by half with a stack mold or high-cavitation tool is too attractive. You are about to sign the purchase order and you are about to print money. Leaping may be risky, however, without seeing the whole picture. Unacknowledged complications in the design, upkeep and day-to-day operation may soon prove that dreamy state of affairs to be a nightmare of machine failures, flaws in quality and unforeseen expenses which may devour all of your anticipated revenues. Preparation to these challenges is dependent on knowing them beforehand.
The two main concealed expenses include the enormously increased investment in initial tooling, and more complicated and specialized maintenance. These molds require an altruistic flow of melt, perfection should occur to fill the cavities evenly (Cavities); a certain unevenness leads to a defect. This makes it more intensive in terms of maintenance and more highly skilled technicians are required hence can result in a longer and more expensive downtime. Moreover, the very quantity of parts being manufactured entails powerful, often mechanized, quality control measures, which is another financial and complication burden.

The Crucial Role of Runner Balancing
This is the single biggest technical challenge. In a 32-cavity mold, the plastic has to travel from the machine nozzle and split 31 times to reach every cavity. The runner system—the network of channels that guides the plastic—must be designed so that the distance, diameter, and temperature are identical for every path. This is called a "geometrically balanced" runner. If one path is slightly shorter or wider, that cavity will fill faster and at a different pressure. This leads to inconsistent parts: some might be complete (good parts), some partially filled (shorts), and some over-packed and leaking (flash). For these complex tools, we don’t guess. We use sophisticated computer simulation software called Mold Flow Analysis. This software simulates the plastic flow and helps us perfect the runner design before a single piece of steel is cut. It’s an essential, non-negotiable step that prevents costly mistakes.
Maintenance: The Achilles’ Heel?
A typical single-cavity mold is rather easy to maintain. A stack mold with 64 cavities is yet another monster. It is an extremely complicated machine with numerous moving components, sensitive hot runners and alignments. A low-level technician can not sustain it. It has to have a team that is highly trained and dedicated. Originally, it is very important that preventative maintenance is introduced. Such molds have to be cleaned, checked, and attended to in a strict routine. Troubleshooting is more complicated when a problem actually arises such as a pin breaking or a heater failure. The process of breaking down a stack mold might require a day, whereas that of a simple tool might require only a few hours. It implies the increase of downtimes in terms of frequency and duration, which should be considered during your planning of production and cost analysis. To business owners such as Michael, a high level of business is a killer and therefore maintenance plan is not a choice but a necessity.
Quality Control at High Speed
Imagine a 32-cavity mold with a 20-second cycle time. That’s 96 parts per minute, or nearly 6,000 parts per hour. How do you inspect them? An operator cannot possibly check every single part for small defects. Relying on spot checks means you could produce thousands of bad parts before the problem is even noticed. For this reason, high-cavitation molding often requires an investment in automated quality control. This typically involves high-speed cameras and vision systems positioned on a conveyor belt after the parts are ejected. The system can inspect every single part in real-time for dimensional accuracy, flash, or short shots, automatically rejecting any defective units. This adds cost to the production cell but is the only way to guarantee 100% quality at such high volumes.
Conclusion
Multi-cavity and stack molds are both potent instruments in increasing the production efficiency and reducing the costs. They are the drivers of the volume production. It does not concern which one is better, it is about which is the right one in your project, your role and what your factory is capable of doing. A typical multi-cavity mold is the workhorse in large volume volumes and a stack mold is the specialist tool which gets the most out of existing equipment. You need to be careful in analyzing what you require and you have to have a good working relationship with a mold maker who really knows the intricacies of these high-tech tools.